Crystal Palace’s hopes of securing a place in the Europa League for the upcoming season hang in the balance as UEFA has postponed its verdict regarding the club’s eligibility. UEFA’s extremely strict interpretation of Crystal Palace’s case under article five of their club competition regulations. This article makes the case against multi-club ownership, forcing the hand in this decision.
The real problem is John Textor. He is the outgoing majority owner of Premier League side Crystal Palace and has an investment in French Ligue 1 side Olympique Lyonnais. This situation raises questions about compliance with UEFA’s rules, which stipulate that no individual or legal entity may control or influence more than one club participating in the same competition.
Crystal Palace had reason to believe they were in a strong position after winning the FA Cup final against Manchester City in May. However, uncertainty emerged regarding their entry into Europe’s second-tier club competition due to UEFA’s stringent ownership criteria. Qualification for the 2025/26 season would require clubs to be compliant as of March 1 of this year.
Ownership Concerns and Relegation Appeal
Textor’s interests in both Crystal Palace and Lyon have complicated the situation. In the real world, Lyon just clinched an automatic spot in the Europa League! Yet, they just got relegated this past week because of financial issues, as ruled by France’s financial watchdog, the DNCG. As if that wasn’t enough, Lyon has since appealed this relegation verdict, complicating matters further.
Textor’s departure from leadership positions at Lyon was a sea change in this regard. Even still, there are important questions remaining about the effect of his unprecedented dual interests. UEFA’s regulations dictate that if both clubs fail to meet eligibility criteria, Lyon’s superior league position could give them precedence over Crystal Palace, further jeopardizing the latter’s chances of participation.
“As part of this settlement, Olympique Lyonnais agreed on an exclusion from the 2025/26 UEFA club competitions should the French authority (DNCG) confirm the club’s relegation to Ligue 2.”
This caveat, of course, highlights just how bad Lyon’s issues could be and what that means for Crystal Palace’s chances. If Lyon’s appeal does indeed fail and they are relegated, Crystal Palace might be the team to take advantage with a Europa League place. Yet the picture is still unclear.
Regulatory Framework and Implications
Similar early regulations by UEFA enforced prohibited ownership of multiple clubs in the same competition to prevent damage to competitive balance. Article five of their club competition regulations specifically prohibits individuals or entities from exerting control over multiple clubs competing in the same tournament. This regulatory framework is designed to maintain the competitive nature of UEFA competitions.
Crystal Palace wanted to win the FA Cup so they could qualify for the Europa League. Now, their fate sits in limbo as UEFA considers their continued eligibility. The length timing of the announcement could have long term consequences for either club.
Lyon’s woes should not be seen as a freak occurrence, as clubs in France and countries throughout Europe face the same fiscal perils. Regulatory bodies such as the DNCG are increasing their vigilance. This change demonstrates a wider move towards tougher enforcement of financial regulation in football.
Future Prospects
The Crystal Palace and Lyon situations are still ongoing, so their outcomes are TBD. UEFA’s postponement has fans and stakeholders optimistic, yet still waiting for answers. They’re itching to see just how far Crystal Palace can go in their Europa League fairy tale.
With Textor preparing to sell his stake in Crystal Palace to New York Jets owner Woody Johnson, the transition could bring new opportunities for the club. Yet, unless UEFA tackles these issues around ownership and financial implications, the future is far from certain.
Leave a Reply