The frightening and infuriating NFL landscape of today is changing. Then on May 8, the Houston Texans had caused a bit of a stir by negotiating a fully guaranteed contract for Tyler Shough, their No. The impact of this unprecedented move has sent a shockwave through the funding ecosystem. Now, there are 30 second-round picks, unsigned, as rookies start to trickle into training camps. This is the high water mark of the overall trend of increasing guaranteed dollars, so watch for that marker. This year, maximum guarantees for second-round players shot up to $247.2 million, versus $185.7 million in 2024.
The increase in guaranteed contracts represents a seismic shift in players’ favor. It does beg questions of how realistic a 90-man roster is as we move closer to the next Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA). The NFL Players Association (NFLPA) have lobbied hard, as have the NFL agents, for similar guarantees. This advocacy has opened the door for a fundamental shift in the business of football.
A New Precedent Set by the Texans
The Texans’ move in deciding to sign Shough to a fully guaranteed contract has rippled through the league like a seismic earthquake. Historically, second-round picks have had a much more tenuous level of financial security compared to those first-rounders. Shough’s agent, Erik Burkhardt, sought to maximize guaranteed money on his rookie deal, viewing it as a bridge to a more lucrative second contract.
“Nobody wants to be the first. I can’t relate to that.” – Lynn
Burkhardt took care to frame this moment within the context of the changing tide of NFL contracts. The agreement for Shough includes one interesting annual roster bonus structure. This structure lets him get the bulk of his money in the opening week of training camp. If successful, this creative framework could establish an effective template for future second-round-pick negotiations going back the other way.
Further, electorate perception of the danger associated with providing more guaranteed cash to second-round picks is pretty low. The risks of third-round picks and below are considered to be much greater. Much like the NFL’s evolution in recent years, teams are more willing than ever to go all in on their future stars.
The Domino Effect on Second-Round Contracts
The Texans’ deal with Shough was a historic one. Now, other teams are following suit, increasing guarantees for their own second-round picks. This trend set off the agents and the NFLPA like a pinball. So, they started a calling spree to advocate for an eight-pick guarantee increase for all.
These conversations spilled over late into the night. Negotiations questioned the fairness of contracts among players at the same position. The aim was clear: to achieve a historic moment for second-round draft choices.
“You can say what you want about the NFLPA, but this doesn’t happen without them.” – Lynn
Only two second-round picks from the 2020 draft were released while on their rookie contracts, highlighting the rarity of such decisions. The success of Shough’s contract has created no small amount of optimism among agents representing second-round clients as they seek to set precedent for similar deals.
As teams continue to operate under the new financial realities, the bottom line will have to be weighed against the public demand for guaranteed contracts. That is still a very fluid situation and how that plays out will surely affect negotiations going forward.
Implications for Future Drafts and Team Strategies
With so much more guaranteed money going to second-round picks, there are important implications for how each NFL team may choose to manage their roster. And as ESPN analyst Jeremy Henderson said, recognizing this business landscape is the key. He noted the need for patience and long-term strategic planning as a priority in agents’ efforts to adapt to players’ evolving expectations.
“We have to see what happens in front of us.” – Burkhardt
As the most important conduit between the union and player agents, Richelieu has been indispensable. More important, he emphasizes how significant these innovations can be to effecting permanent change within the league. The big question is, can teams continue to operate under a model of almost all of the draft class getting guaranteed contracts?
Some executives express skepticism regarding this trend. One AFC executive pointed out how guaranteed contracts can be perilous. He cautioned that if all the teams did these deals, it would lead to massive financial disparities.
“Having guaranteed contracts in this league universally is not something that works.” – AFC executive
As discussions continue around roster sizes and guaranteed money, teams may need to reassess their strategies to remain competitive while adhering to evolving player demands.
Leave a Reply