The National Football League Players Association (NFLPA) has announced its intention to appeal an arbitrator’s ruling regarding a grievance it filed against the NFL. The complaint was aimed particularly at the league’s alleged collusion to restrict fully guaranteed contracts to players. This problem has received significant scrutiny ever since the Cleveland Browns signed quarterback Deshaun Watson to a fully guaranteed $230 million deal in 2022.
Arbitrator Christopher Droney ruled recently on this issue. His reasoning behind the high burden of proof he found to be lacking, collusion between team owners during the contract negotiations with quarterbacks. His opinion was not only a slapdown of the NFLPA’s demand, it was a complete dismissal and no damages were awarded. Droney further affirmed that the NFL office had discussed and supported joint action on contract talks. This conversation happened at the annual league meeting in mid-March.
In response to the ruling, NFLPA Executive Director DeMaurice Smith and other leaders expressed their commitment to advancing the interests of players while carefully assessing the implications of Droney’s decision.
“We’ll do what’s best for players, and we’ll exhaust our options in doing so,” stated a senior union source familiar with the matter, highlighting the NFLPA’s determination to pursue justice for its members.
The NFLPA filed a major grievance against the league on occupational safety grounds. Their goal was to push back against what they consider harmful practices in collective bargaining. The record-setting, and likely league-shifting, contract awarded to Watson sent players into a frenzy over fully guaranteed contracts possibly becoming the norm.
134 grievance and subsequent ruling, here’s what analysts Dan Graziano and Andrew Hawkins had to say. Their piece underscored the persistent conflict between player interests and league policy.
In the wake of Droney’s ruling, the NFLPA, heading into its appeal under the leadership of Howell, swiftly and loudly signaled that it would pursue an appeal. From the start, the leadership pushed back on any hints of factionalism or skepticism regarding its purpose. “As members of the NFLPA Executive Committee, we categorically reject false reports insinuating doubts within this committee or suggestions that we have asked our Executive Director to step down,” stated the committee.
The appeal process will likely unfold amid growing scrutiny of player contracts and the broader implications of guaranteed money in the NFL. The NFLPA hopes to appeal the ruling. They seek to establish a precedent for future negotiations that might have huge impact on players’ economic well being.
Droney’s findings have sparked discussions about the balance of power within the league, particularly regarding how contracts are negotiated and what guarantees players can expect. In fact, the arbitration result could set a strong precedent. This new precedent can now either help or hurt players as they try to obtain fully guaranteed contracts moving forward.
Leave a Reply