Newcastle United and Tottenham Hotspur played an absolute barnburner today, a 2-2 draw that highlighted Tyneside’s growing stature. All of that excitement was hijacked by a highly debatable VAR decision. Late in the game, Dan Burn bodied Tottenham’s Rodrigo Bentancur. This seemingly innocuous foul was the catalyst for the match officials to award a penalty to Newcastle. This decision has sparked heated debate among pundits and fans alike, raising questions about the consistency of VAR protocols in football.
With just a few minutes to go in the match, Bentancur tried to get behind Burn in an effort to score. During this play, Burn really should have just bear hugged Bentancur with both arms. Most observers viewed such a move as a penalty. In their analysis of the play, VAR overturned the original call on the field. The foul led to a penalty awarded in favor of Newcastle, which Anthony Gordon converted with just four minutes remaining on the clock.
The Incident and Its Implications
That forwarding holding incident between Burn and Bentancur was picked apart by the panel to an absurd degree. Pundit Jamie Redknapp, a high-profile former England international and beloved football commentator, claimed the foul wasn’t enough to give a penalty. He’s right, that stuff happens all the time at a match, there’s “10 of those a game,” as he put it.
“This is never a penalty.” – Jamie Redknapp
In opposition to Redknapp’s assertion, the right decision remained and Newcastle was the team to profit from the VAR replay. Unlike such public displays of dissent, Thomas Frank, the coach of Brentford, was still clearly upset with VAR’s intervention. He described it as an “all-time blunder,” claiming the play should have been returned to the original on-field call.
“It was an absolute mistake from the VAR.” – Thomas Frank
Frank’s comments are part of an increasing chorus of managerial exasperation with VAR to illustrate the arbitrariness of VAR interpretations.
Managers Weigh In
Following the match, both Eddie Howe and Thomas Frank shared their perspectives on what happened. Howe accepted the rationale for the decision to impose a penalty. He thought the way VAR standards were applied was unclear.
“I’ve seen it again, the defender doesn’t look at the ball, he’s just focused on Dan and Dan goes down, so I can see why it was given.” – Eddie Howe
Howe’s comments underlined just how difficult it can be to read such occurrences through the lens of VAR rules. He noted that Burn’s holding could be viewed as having an impact on Bentancur’s ability to challenge for the ball, aligning with some criteria for awarding penalties.
The Conversation Around VAR Consistency
Jamie Redknapp went even further, condemning the VAR circus born of unnecessary changes to the game, for itself, absurd post-match VAR decisions. His remarks underscore a growing movement among football commentators. As fans, they want VAR to be used uniformly across football to promote fairness and transparency within the beautiful game.
The event raised important questions about individual choices in the world of football. It served to shed light on the overall consequences of VAR technology in the game. Fans and analysts alike are demanding more transparent use of these guidelines in order to prevent this type of controversy going forward in similar matches.
Regardless of how contentious the penalty decision was in the moment, both teams should be commended for what was a terrific match from start to finish. Newcastle and Tottenham both walked away with important points earned as they both look towards important runs in the Premier League table.
Leave a Reply