In a recent football match that saw several contentious decisions, commentators and analysts have weighed in on the incidents involving Viktor Gyokeres and Nick Pope, along with other key plays. These discussions have helped to explain how complicated referee decisions can be, especially regarding penalties and red cards. Fans and professionals alike are analyzing to what extent the VAR influenced these decisions. As such, they are looking for clear rules that will govern these high-stakes moments.
A key moment came when keeper Nick Pope crashed into striker Viktor Gyokeres in the first half. VAR very closely examined the state of play. Pope’s challenge on Gyokeres was controversial enough to question if a penalty should’ve even been given in the first place. Pope definitely misjudged that cross, not making any contact with the ball as he went for it. Instead, he planted his foot in a direction that prevented him from completely going through with the tackle. Dermot Gallagher, a former referee and current FIFA analyst, tried to fathom his first reaction. He thought it should’ve been a pen for Gyokeres.
The Gyokeres and Pope Incident
The incident involving Nick Pope and Viktor Gyokeres in the penalty box even had VAR officials instantly placing it under review. Gallagher noted that Pope did touch the ball, too. This single brave act did not remove him from culpability in mismanaging the challenge.
“It’s a tough call for the referee. If he doesn’t give a penalty, I don’t know why he’s played on because I don’t think he’s dived.” – Dermot Gallagher
Even though Gallagher’s first instinct was to call a penalty, VAR made the correct decision that Pope was in the right. That decision to reexamine the incident led to even more controversy, as Gallagher said that he was alarmed by the process.
“They looked at it, looked at it and looked at it. I have a theory that your gut takes over. You look at a replay and you make up your mind. The more you look at it, the more you doubt yourself.” – Dermot Gallagher
The Bryan Mbeumo Situation
The other pivotal moment of the game was also the subject of controversy for the same Mbeumo. Gallagher’s comments on the red card given to Mbeumo noted that Mbeumo got a touch, but it was obvious he wasn’t going to be able to control the ball. This ruling attracted even more backlash given how much it changed the result of a proceeding play.
“Nathan panics. He pulls his shirt and if he doesn’t do that, Mbeumo, who got a touch to the ball, would have got it. He’s got a clear goalscoring opportunity eight yards out.” – Dermot Gallagher
Gallagher argued vigorously that Mbeumo’s inability to retain possession was no reason to go easy on Nathan. Nathan’s foul on the play was entirely uncalled for, and he needs to be punished.
“It baffles me. Mbeumo is not in control of the ball because he’s not going to control it. He’s going to hit that first time. The pace is on the cross and all he is going to do is redirect the ball towards the corner.” – Jay Bothroyd
Along with other analysis, it has emphasized the exceptionally fine margins that referees have to operate within when making decisions in the moment.
Red Cards and VAR Reviews
The match turned upside down when London product Trevoh Chalobah was shown a red card. This decision followed a VAR check that revoked his initially shown yellow card by the on-field referee. This incident marked a pivotal moment in the VAR’s involvement to protect player safety, as well as the upholding of the game’s rules.
As former Premiership ref Dermot Gallagher pointed out, referees need to be sure they would make the same call knowing VAR would step in. He explained that, unintentionally, the reviews result in second-guessing of the original call.
“In that case, unless you are convinced he’s handled the ball, play on.” – Dermot Gallagher
That review process has become the fuel for real conversations about whether VAR is helping or hurting soccer. Fans and analysts alike are calling for much more consistency in how it’s being applied.
Leave a Reply