Wimbledon organizers were forced to apologize after a major electronic line-calling malfunction marred a fourth-round match on Sunday. The incident occurred on Centre Court between Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova and Sonay Kartal, where the electronic line-calling system malfunctioned, leading to confusion for players and spectators alike.
In response to this controversy, the All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club (AELTC) officially denied that they cut the electronic line-calling system during the match. This electronic system had replaced human line umpires for this year’s tournament. That’s because officials really had no time to make an informed decision. Then they deleted the option to manually stop the ball tracking, producing a bizarre scenario on the court.
A dramatic scene played out on stage when the automated referee unexpectedly yelled, “stop, stop! Needless to say, this surprise order had players and supporters traveling hurling by the bewilderment. The chair umpire, Nico Helwerth, halted the match to check on it. He announced that he first needed to see if the system was “up and running.” What he didn’t know was that it had been dormant.
Pavlyuchenkova was very emotional about the circumstance, highlighting how it affected her mental approach and therefore her play. “The way they implemented it was confusing,” she said. This occurred shortly after Helwerth instructed a point to be rerun rather than giving it to her. “You took the game away from me. … They stole the game from me. They stole it,” she stated.
The occurrence changed the course of the game completely. Kartal took full advantage of the uncertainty to seal the break to win the point, breaking Pavlyuchenkova’s serve to lead 5-4. In high-stakes situations, Pavlyuchenkova expresses a firm conviction that human intervention is essential. These are the types of questions that she argues should lead to implementing a much more reliable system, like those used in football.
If something significant occurs in the game, we want to be ready. So I think we should try to get a wire kind of system, like they have in football. Then it’s transparent for everyone and we can get to work immediately rather than making assumptions, she said.
After the incident, a spokesperson for the AELTC admitted to the mistake and stated that they will do whatever is needed to ensure all players experience fair play. “We have apologized to the players involved,” they stated. They further explained the reliance on technology: “The live ELC (electronic line-calling) system relies on the Hawk-Eye operators, the Review Official and the technology to work in harmony. This did not happen. In this case, we did find human error as the cause. Instead, we took a hard look in the mirror at our application process and made the changes required.
This unfortunate occurrence has raised a great deal of recently contentious debate around tennis players on whether or not this new automated line-calling system is actually working. As player Belinda Bencic pointed out, this is precisely what gets discussed among players in the locker room. In the meantime, Emma Raducanu and Jack Draper both expressed uncertainty about how reliable it was. Fellow Brit Raducanu described it as “dodgy.” Her remarks embodied a fear that many have expressed regarding the dangers of relying on technology to do it all.
Leave a Reply